Warner Bros. tried SO hard to give audiences what they wanted with Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, a film that finally united their two biggest superhero characters in a live-action movie and added Wonder Woman into the mix, too, just to be a little more awesome. It was one of the most talked about films in years, but then the reviews came out, and enthusiasm waned a bit. Batman v Superman set box office records on its opening weekend, then broke a different kind of box office record on its second weekend: one of the biggest audience drop offs in movie history.
Hollywood is just like any other industry. It runs on money. So when Batman v Superman appeared to be making money, the narrative that the studios, industry insiders, and franchise apologists tried to shove down our collective throats was that the audience had spoken. What they didn’t take into account was that an enormous number of the tickets for opening weekend had been pre-sold, weeks in advance of any first-hand buzz. Batman v Superman still has many fans, but many of them were fans before they even saw the film for themselves. Once it actually came out, the word of mouth was mixed from audiences and critics alike, and now it looks like the film may not even break $1 billion internationally.

Warner Bros.
Also: Ben Affleck Has Written His Own ‘Batman’ Movie
That’s disappointing by any measure. Some industry analysts had even posited that Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice needed $800 million just to break even. How does that work, you ask? The film reportedly cost $250 million, but those figures are typically lowballed and rarely – if ever – take marketing costs into account. But more than that, studios like Warner Bros. use major franchise films as “tentpoles.” We use that word for a reason: the blockbuster success of a film like Batman v Superman can absorb the cost of a studio’s various misfires and, perhaps more significantly, its artistically ambitious smaller releases.
Last year, Warner Bros. released more films than any other major studio. But for every success (Mad Max: Fury Road, San Andreas, Creed) there were several bombs (Jupiter Ascending, Pan, In the Heart of the Sea, Point Break). This is par for the course, but if a tentpole falls – and falls hard – then everything underneath it is affected. That’s why Hollywood Reporter is claiming that the studio is seriously considering reducing the number of films they produce overall, and focusing instead on their three biggest franchises: LEGO, Harry Potter and the DC superhero universe.
It seems ironic, especially from the outside (and heck, even in here too), that the solution to a disappointing superhero movie is to make more superhero movies. But Warner Bros. didn’t release any superhero movies last year (unless you count Batkid) and it still came up short compared to rival studio Universal, which had three films gross more than $1.5 billion worldwide in 2015 (Furious 7, Jurassic World and Minions).

Warner Bros.
Also: ‘Batman v Superman’ Review | Whoever Wins… We Lose
So the studio wasn’t doing great right now already, although the continuation of the Harry Potter series with this year’s Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is promising. Warner Bros. is actually positioned to have a lot of potential hits this year but few of them seem likely to breakout into the billions, unless you think audiences are really clamoring for The Legend of Tarzan, The Conjuring 2 and Central Intelligence in record numbers.
We don’t cover the box office very often here at Crave, because it doesn’t impact audiences as much as you might think. A successful film will yield more films like it, and an unsuccessful film will usually kill a franchise. What’s so unusual here is that the opposite may now be true: Warner Bros. is forcing itself to double down on a series suffering from bad word of mouth, in large part because they’ve already made their commitments.

Warner Bros.
Also: Why Fistfights Are POINTLESS in Superhero Movies
Wonder Woman is already being filmed, and even just bumped up its release date from June 23, 2017 to June 2, 2017. Zack Snyder is gearing up for Justice League – Part One, and it is unclear whether he will have time to make any meaningful changes to that project, which was presumably going to follow Batman v Superman in tone and content. And the supervillain team-up movie Suicide Squad is allegedly being reshot to include more of the humorous content fans responded to in the trailer, because (again, allegedly) the rest of the film was going to be just as dour as Batman v Superman was.
Warner Bros. is essentially stuck with these films, and if they’re not going to make a ton of money then the studio simply won’t have the scratch left over to produce smaller films, Oscar contenders and so on. It would appear that by committing to a major franchise before they knew that audiences actually WANTED that franchise, Warner Bros. has dug itself an enormous hole and jumped inside. It may take years for the studio to crawl out.
William Bibbiani (everyone calls him ‘Bibbs’) is Crave’s film content editor and critic. You can hear him every week on The B-Movies Podcast and watch him on the weekly YouTube series Most Craved and What the Flick. Follow his rantings on Twitter at @WilliamBibbiani.
Eight Iconic Superhero Fights You Will Never See in a Movie:
Top Photo: Warner Bros.
Eight Iconic Superhero Fights You Will Never See in a Movie
-
Avengers vs. X-Men
Marvel's biggest superhero teams came to blows in the epic, multi-series crossover Avengers vs. X-Men (a.k.a. AvX) in 2012, but the two franchises are owned by different studios - Avengers at Disney, X-Men at Fox - and it's unlike they will ever want to share the profits on what could be the biggest movie ever produced.
Photo: Marvel
-
Batman vs. Guy Gardner
Warner Bros. owns the rights to both Batman and Guy Gardner, Earth's jerkiest Green Lantern, but the odds that they'll actually put Gardner in a movie - especially when Hal Jordan, John Stewart and Kyle Rayner are more popular - are pretty slim. So the iconic fight in which Batman took Guy out in a single punch will, sadly, probably never make it in front of the cameras.
Photo: DC
-
Daredevil vs. Sub-Mariner
In one of the great early Marvel superhero fights, Sub-Mariner emerged from Atlantis to destroy humanity, and only Daredevil was around to stop him. Outmatched in every way, Daredevil fought until he collapsed. Sub-Mariner respected his fearlessness so much he figured humanity was worth sparing. Both characters are owned by Marvel, but the studio is still trying to get the rights to Sub-Mariner sorted out after the character was originally optioned by Universal.
Photo: Marvel
-
The Hulk vs. The Thing
The strongest, most misunderstood monsters in the Marvel Universe have a long and storied history of beating the crap out of each other. Who is strongest? Who is toughest? We may never know in live-action, since Fox owns the rights to Fantastic Four and Marvel's got The Hulk under their own banner.
-
Marvel vs. DC
It took decades for Marvel and DC to set aside their differences long enough for a comic book crossover between their competing superhero universes, and it will probably be at least that long before Marvel Studios and Warner Bros. seriously consider letting Batman fight Captain America, Superman fight Thor, and so on and so forth.
Photo: Marvel and DC
-
Superboy vs. Superboy Prime
The teenaged clone of Superman and Lex Luthor repeatedly fought an alternate reality Superboy who was a dangerously insane mass murderer. Yeah, even though Warner Bros. obviously owns both Superboy and Superboy Prime, the odds that we'll ever see their weird, epic, head-exploding battle on the big screen are extremely low.
Photo: DC
-
Superman vs. Muhammad Ali
Aliens have challenged Earth's mightiest champion, but when Superman steps forward, the legendary boxer Muhammad Ali points out that he's not really from Earth. So they fight to prove who is truly the greatest, and sure enough, Muhammad Ali kicks Superman's ass (in all fairness, the hero's powers were deactivated, and he put up a good fight). But it seems highly unlikely that Warner Bros. will decide to send Superman back in time to fight Ali in his prime, doesn't it?
Photo: DC
-
Wolverine vs. Anyone Cool
In the Marvel Comics, fighting Wolverine is like a rite of passage. He's had iconic tussles with The Hulk, Captain America and Spider-Man, and was thrown head-to-head against any rookie hero that the publisher wanted to prove was a badass. But Wolverine is owned by Fox, who only have the rights to the X-Men and the Fantastic Four. We will probably never see Wolverine fight an Avenger in a live-action movie, and that sucks.
Photo: Marvel