Prince Harry is reportedly needed for the royal family’s vitality. It has been years since the Duke of Sussex cut ties with the royal family. Since then, the monarchy has allegedly lacked the humor and warmth that his presence brought. As per a source, the royals have entered a “joyless era.”
Prince Harry ‘vital’ to Royal Family as his absence risks ‘real danger,’ says source
Experts have told Prince Harry is “vital” for the royal family as it is stuck in a “joyless era,” according to an insider. Supporters have reportedly said that the monarchy has paid a cultural price for his absence. One royal source told the outlet, “What the monarchy is lacking at the moment is the lightness Harry once brought with him.” They added, “He had a natural humor and ease that cut through formality. Without that presence, the institution feels unusually somber.”
“It has created an atmosphere that many see as its most joyless period in years,” the insider continued. This is “making it harder for the public to feel engaged.” Analysts have observed a deeper generational problem among senior working royals in the 60s, while younger royals are less likely to prefer the monarchy.
One palace watcher shared, “This is precisely why Harry still matters to the monarchy’s public image. He understands how to reach audiences who are unmoved by ceremony and scripted addresses.” Additionally, the prince “communicates in a way that feels natural to people who would otherwise switch off.” Another royal expert agreed and shared how those shaping “Brand Royalty” should accept Harry “like family” again.
They continued, “Like any institution that wants to survive long term, the monarchy cannot rely on a single audience. It has to speak across age groups and social divides if it hopes to remain relevant.”
As such, the source feels “Harry’s skills make him vital to the royal’s brand.” A royal aide explained, “Harry had an ability to connect with people who felt alienated by the formality of royal communications.” They added, “His natural warmth and humor softened the institution and helped it feel relatable rather than remote.”
Originally reported by Ritika Singh for RealityTea.
